Please Note: You are viewing the unstyled version of Maddox Hargett & Caruso, P.C. Either your browser does not support CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) or it is disabled. As a result, much of this website will not look the way it was intended, although all of its contents will be accessible to you. For more information, visit our Browser Support page.

Skip to Primary Site Navigation, Content, Sidebar


We don't stop until we get the whole story.
Home > About Us

About Us

Maddox Hargett & Caruso, P.C. represents investors who have lost money because of investment fraud, stockbroker misconduct or professional negligence. The firm is comprised of six experienced attorneys who are very knowledgeable in securities law. Over the last 16 years, our securities lawyers have represented more than 1000 clients in arbitration and other forums for dispute resolution.

The Firm's Prior Experience


Prudential Case Update

October 2002, Maddox Hargett & Caruso, P.C. received a $262 million jury verdict against Prudential Securities, Inc. This verdict included $250 million in punitive damages and has been reported as the largest jury verdict in the state of Ohio and the single largest securities class action jury verdict. The award was later downgraded on appeal, to $33 million. Nonetheless, the Prudential verdict was a wake-up call for Wall Street.

The plaintiffs were mostly elderly people who had turned their retirement nest eggs over to Prudential for investment management. During a brief slump in the market, Prudential clients claimed their broker sold most of their stocks without their knowledge or permission. The clients missed out when the market quickly rose, because their money had been taken out of stocks and put into bonds. Because the broker thought the market was headed for a large fall when in fact the downturn was quite short lived, this case has become known as the “Chicken Little” case.

Investors Compensated For Losses

The attorneys at Maddox Hargett & Caruso, P.C. have represented more than 1000 individual investors in their claims against financial planners, investment advisors and stockbrokers. A large percentage of these investors have received compensation for their losses as a result.

We have brought cases against many of Wall Street's largest firms, including Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Solomon Smith Barney, Wachovia Securities, Prudential Securities, UB/PaineWebber, A.G. Edwards, Edward Jones, and Bear Stearns. We are well-known by our opponents as well as our colleagues in investor representation.

A Look At Our Qualifications

Members of our firm, Maddox Hargett & Caruso, P.C., have come to know the securities environment from unique vantage points inside government and the brokerage industry. Mark E. Maddox, the firm's founder, is a former State Securities Commissioner. Thomas A. Hargett worked as a broker before attending law school. And Steven B. Caruso previously served as General Counsel to a national brokerage company.

Our attorneys have brought cases against most of Wall Street's biggest firms including, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Solomon Smith Barney, Wachovia Securities, Prudential Securities, UBS, A.G. Edwards, Edward Jones, and Bear Stearns.

Maddox Hargett & Caruso delivers the depth of experience necessary to represent investors who have been defrauded or unlawfully under served by brokers, brokerage firms, financial advisors and insurance companies.

Representing Investors

The law firm of Maddox Hargett & Caruso takes legal action on the investor's behalf when stockbrokers, investment advisors or financial planners may be at fault. Attorneys Mark Maddox, Tom Hargett and Steven Caruso are driven by a strong sense of purpose. They believe that individual investors have the right to meet the brokerage industry on a level playing field to air disputes. Today they serve clients who are driven by similar convictions, and eager to meet tough financial industry opponents with an equally powerful show of strength.

Our attorneys offer hope, and a balanced view, for investors who find themselves on the losing end of irresponsible or dishonest investment management.


Top of Page

Terms And Titles

My advisor isn't a broker. Does that protect me?

Today, it is not just stockbrokers who defraud or harm investors. Brokerage and investment firms often call their employees “financial professionals” or “investment advisors” rather than stockbrokers. This distinction does not change the salesperson's code of conduct or obligation to the customer. Regardless of what a firm calls its sales force, investors must be careful in their dealings with anyone in the securities or insurance industry.


“We hope this (Prudential) verdict sends a loud message to Wall Street that they must respond to problems immediately in an honest and ethical fashion.” Tom Hargett


Folders

The Motive

Why did my broker do this to me?

There are many reasons why investors get taken advantage of by their investment advisor. Probably the most common reason is greed on the part of the registered representative. Though the securities industry is attempting to move away from commission based transactions with investors, the vast majority of all securities transactions are still commission based. For instance, insurance agents and financial planners may receive commissions of up to 7% on annuities, which they share with their firm. Load based mutual funds typically pay only, on average, 4% to the registered rep. Selling stocks or bonds pay the representative only 1%. Therefore, the advisor is tempted to sell a product that might not be suitable for the investor, because he or she will be paid more.